- Mastercard v Merricks—an important year for collective proceedings and representative actions
- ‘Collective’ competition proceedings
- The approach of the Supreme Court
- A wider relevance?
Dispute Resolution analysis: In Mastercard v Merricks, the Supreme Court has clarified the requirements for certification of collective proceedings in competition cases. This is a significant decision, likely to be relied upon by claimants seeking to recover follow-on damages for competition law infringements where difficult questions arise as to the quantification of loss and proposals for the distribution of any award of damages to the certified class.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial