- Loss of ‘without prejudice’ protection by agreement (Willers v Joyce—Joyce v De Cruz Solicitors)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: In Willers v Joyce and others, the court held that inter-solicitor correspondence which referred to earlier settlement discussions was admissible in an application for costs because the parties had agreed that everything said and done during those settlement discussions could be referred to at a future costs hearing. Written by Kristina Lukacova, barrister at New Square Chambers.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial