- Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution weekly highlights—4 February 2016
- In this issue:
- Professional negligence Precedents
- Fixed costs regime—will it be extended?
- EU referendum
- Headlines (News updates & analysis)
- Court of Appeal—condition not stifling
- Court of Appeal—breach of warranty: contract or tort?
- Court of Appeal—Part 36 and costs
- Court of Appeal—costs discretion
- Rome I and Rome II—insurer indemnity claims
- Freezing orders—enforcing a WFO abroad
- Part 36—contribution claims
- Costs—tactics and recoverability
- CFA—severing appeal provisions from retainer
- Relevant updates from other practice areas
- New and updated on Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution
- New Precedents
- Updated Practice Notes
- Latest Q&As
Welcome to the weekly highlights from the Lexis®PSL Dispute Resolution team for the week ending 4 February. This week’s edition includes feature articles on professional negligence precedents, Lord Justice Jackson’s lecture on fixed costs and the EU referendum. We also highlight analysis of judgments and developments spanning a broad range of matters, including: appeal conditions (Goldtrail); breach of warranty claims (Karim); enforcing WFOs abroad (Arcadia); and, Part 36 and contribution claims (Mohidin). As usual, we also identify core content which has been updated over the last week to reflect the latest developments. All this, and more, in our weekly highlights.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial