Legal News

Landlord with break stuck with sub-tenant’s section 26 request (Fast Drinks v Cetyl)

Landlord with break stuck with sub-tenant’s section 26 request (Fast Drinks v Cetyl)
Published on: 02 February 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Landlord with break stuck with sub-tenant’s section 26 request (Fast Drinks v Cetyl)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What were the facts of the case?
  • What is the law in this area?
  • What were the main legal arguments arising?
  • What did the court decide?
  • How did the court reach the conclusion that there were cases where the proviso did not apply?
  • To what extent is the judgment helpful?
  • Case details

Article summary

Property analysis: A sub-tenant’s request for a new tenancy under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954), s 26 (section 26 request), specifying a commencement date before the existing contractual expiry date, was held to be valid where the sub-underlease had automatically terminated when the head landlord broke its lease. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents