- IP claim stayed conditionally pursuant to AA 1996, s 9 and court’s case management powers (AJA Registrars v AJA Europe)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- The stay application
- Application amendment
- Case details
Arbitration analysis: Mr Justice Fancourt in the Intellectual Property List of the Chancery Division granted the defendant a conditional stay of the claimants’ intellectual property (IP) claim pursuant to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) and its inherent case management jurisdiction. Among other matters, the judgment provides a reasonably rare example of the High Court addressing the intersection between IP claims and arbitration.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial