Legal News

IP claim stayed conditionally pursuant to AA 1996, s 9 and court’s case management powers (AJA Registrars v AJA Europe)

IP claim stayed conditionally pursuant to AA 1996, s 9 and court’s case management powers (AJA Registrars v AJA Europe)
Published on: 27 April 2020
Published by: LexisPSL
  • IP claim stayed conditionally pursuant to AA 1996, s 9 and court’s case management powers (AJA Registrars v AJA Europe)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • The stay application
  • Application amendment
  • Case details

Article summary

Arbitration analysis: Mr Justice Fancourt in the Intellectual Property List of the Chancery Division granted the defendant a conditional stay of the claimants’ intellectual property (IP) claim pursuant to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) and its inherent case management jurisdiction. Among other matters, the judgment provides a reasonably rare example of the High Court addressing the intersection between IP claims and arbitration. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents