- Introducing further evidence after final judgment is delivered (AR v ML)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Family analysis: In AR v ML, Mostyn J overturned a trial judge’s decision to allow an application, after delivery of the final hearing judgment, to adjourn the case so that the wife could have the opportunity to present new evidence by way of property particulars. Matthew Richardson, barrister at Coram Chambers, comments on the case and its implications.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial