- Interpretation of contractual indemnity and implied terms (Zahid v Duthus Group Investments Ltd)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Commercial analysis: Lucy McCann, associate at Brodies LLP, discusses Zahid v Duthus Group Investments Ltd (DGO)—a case heard in the Scottish courts—which examined the conditions under which a term can be implied into a contract and the test of `reasonable person’.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial