- Intergenerational fairness as a justification for age discrimination (Air Products plc v Cockram)
- What are the practical implications of the case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Pensions analysis: Was a rule that would benefit a person who retired after age 55 age discriminatory? Naomi Ling, a barrister who specialises in employment and pensions law at Outer Temple Chambers, explains the implications of the case of Air Products plc v Cockram for arguments of intergenerational fairness in age discrimination decisions.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial