Legal News

In Brief: UKSC considers SAAMCO (BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland)

In Brief: UKSC considers SAAMCO (BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland)
Published on: 22 March 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • In Brief: UKSC considers SAAMCO (BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • Recovering damages for professional negligence—the crux of the issue in this case
  • Understanding SAAMCO
  • Case details

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: In dismissing the claimant’s appeal against the Court of Appeal decision reducing his damages against his solicitors to nil, the Supreme Court considered the key question of what damages are recoverable in a case where (i) but for the negligence of a professional adviser his client would not have embarked on some course of action, but (ii) part or all of the loss which he suffered by doing so arose from risks which it was no part of the adviser’s duty to protect his client against? This consideration (unanimously approved) involved Lord Sumption engaging in an analysis of the decision in SAAMCO and as considered in subsequent decisions. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents