- In brief: Trial proceeds in parties’ absence (Dana Gas PJSC v Dana Gas Sukuk Ltd)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was this case about?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: John Bignall, barrister at 7 King’s Bench Walk, considers the case of Dana Gas PJSC v Dana Gas Sukuk Ltd. The court held that a trial could proceed in the absence of parties, where an intervener opposed its adjournment, in circumstances where anti-suit injunctions were made in another jurisdiction precluding the participation of the original parties.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial