Legal News

In brief: Industrial application and sufficiency threshold where the science is dubious (Oleg Iliich Epshtein v Comptroller-General of Patent, Designs and Trade Marks)

In brief: Industrial application and sufficiency threshold where the science is dubious (Oleg Iliich Epshtein v Comptroller-General of Patent, Designs and Trade Marks)
Published on: 28 September 2016
Published by: LexisPSL
  • In brief: Industrial application and sufficiency threshold where the science is dubious (Oleg Iliich Epshtein v Comptroller-General of Patent, Designs and Trade Marks)
  • Original news
  • What was this case about?
  • What did the court decide?
  • What should IP & IT lawyers take note of?

Article summary

IP & IT analysis: The claimed invention was of a type of ‘alternative’ medicine whose mechanism and effectiveness was not generally accepted by the scientific community as a whole. The hearing officer had rejected 11 patent applications, on the ground that the applications did not disclose a plausible explanation for the therapeutic effect. The court reversed that decision. Jonathan Gale, intellectual property barrister at St Philips Chambers, considers the case of Oleg Iliich Epshtein v Comptroller-General of Patent, Designs and Trade Marks. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents