Legal News

In brief: ICSID tribunal decides company’s seat does not establish nationality (CFHL v Cameroon)

In brief: ICSID tribunal decides company’s seat does not establish nationality (CFHL v Cameroon)
Published on: 28 June 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • In brief: ICSID tribunal decides company’s seat does not establish nationality (CFHL v Cameroon)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this decision?
  • What was this case about?
  • What did the tribunal decide?
  • What was Alexis Mourre’s dissenting opinion?
  • Case details

Article summary

Arbitration analysis: An International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) tribunal has decided that it does not have jurisdiction to hear an expropriation claim against Cameroon brought by a Luxembourg registered company. It has held that the claimant did not really have Luxembourgian nationality for the purposes of the 1981 treaty between the Belgium-Luxembourg Economic Union and Cameroon. Alexis Mourre made a dissenting opinion, noting that the treaty’s definition of nationality depended solely on the location of a corporate entity’s statutory seat and did not permit the majority’s interpretation. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents