- In brief: Course not provider—entitlement to EHC assessment post 16(The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v GG (SEN))
- Original news
- What should education lawyers take note of?
- What was this case about?
- What did the court decide?
Local Government analysis: The Upper Tribunal has ruled that the fact that a young person studies a course provided by a higher education institution does not mean that they are necessarily pursuing ‘higher education’. Whether a young person is in ‘higher education’—and therefore excluded from the EHC plan assessment process—is determined by the course they are studying, not the institution providing it.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial