- In brief: Assignment of cause of action not void for breaching the rules against champerty and maintenance (Casehub Ltd v Wolf Cola Ltd)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was this case about?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: Jeff Hardman, barrister at New Square Chambers, considers the High Court decision in Casehub Ltd v Wolf Cola Ltd, being a useful illustration of the distinction made between assigning a cause of action and assigning the fruits of a cause of action.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial