- Identifying parties to assist with the recovery of a child in abduction proceedings (RJ v Tigipko)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Family analysis: Adam Wolanski QC, barrister at 5RB, discusses the decisions in RJ v Tigipko, where the court was concerned with the issue of publicity in a case involving the abduction of children to a 1996 Hague Convention country and the circumstances in which publicity would be in the best interests of the children.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial