- How to comply with an order requiring an RFI response under CPR 18 (Owners of the Motor Vessel ‘Gravity Highway’ v Owners of the Motor Vessel ‘Maritime Maisie’)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: The judgment is the first post-CPR authority to address directly the test for whether an order requiring a party to provide further information under CPR 18 has been complied with. The court held that in assessing whether there has been compliance with an order for the provision of further information, the court will consider whether the information is plainly incomplete or insufficient. The decision therefore confirms that the test suggested in the pre-CPR authority QPS Consultants Ltd v Kruger Tissue (Manufacturing) Ltd still applies. Written by Benjamin Coffer and Robert Ward, barristers, at Quadrant Chambers.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial