- High Court refuses to continue anti-enforcement injunction (Ecobank v Tanoh)
- Practical implications
- What was the background to the decision?
- Was the court prepared to continue the injunction?
- What did the court have to say regarding the jurisdiction to make an anti-enforcement injunction?
- Court and judgment details
Dispute Resolution analysis: in a judgment dated 3 July 2015, Mr Justice Knowles refused to continue an anti-enforcement injunction to uphold an arbitration agreement. The decision is of interest to practitioners as there are few reported judgments on applications for anti-enforcement injunctions, and, even though the interim anti-enforcement order was discharged by the judge following a inter partes hearing, the decision adds to the small pool of jurisprudence on this exceptional remedy.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial