Legal News

Hearings to decide interim relief applications are public hearings (Queensgate Investments LLP and others v Millet)

Hearings to decide interim relief applications are public hearings (Queensgate Investments LLP and others v Millet)
Published on: 22 January 2021
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Hearings to decide interim relief applications are public hearings (Queensgate Investments LLP and others v Millet)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What is the background?
  • Relevant law
  • Background facts
  • Decision of the employment tribunal
  • What did the EAT decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Employment analysis: A hearing to determine an application for interim relief in an unfair dismissal claim involves the determination of a ‘preliminary issue’ for the purposes of Rule 53(3) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (the ET Rules) and should therefore be conducted in public unless there are grounds for all or part of the hearing to be conducted in private under either Rule 50 (privacy and restrictions on disclosure) or Rule 94 (national security proceedings), according to the EAT. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents