Legal News

Guidance on when a philosophical belief is protected from discrimination (Gray v Mulberry Company (Design))

Guidance on when a philosophical belief is protected from discrimination (Gray v Mulberry Company (Design))
Published on: 27 July 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Guidance on when a philosophical belief is protected from discrimination (Gray v Mulberry Company (Design))
  • What are the practical implications of this judgment?
  • What is the relevant background?
  • Background law
  • Background facts
  • The decision of the employment tribunal
  • What did the EAT decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Employment analysis: Guidance on when a philosophical belief will have the required level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance to be protected from discrimination has been given by the EAT in a judgment which also finds that the sole adherent of a philosophical belief is not protected from indirect discrimination (because they cannot show the necessary disadvantage to a group). or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents