- Exploring the use of employment contracts in the gig economy
- Original news
- Are companies under any obligation to ensure employment contracts are written in clear language? Does the employment contract have to be understandable to the employee?
- By altering the vocabulary in employment contracts, are companies able to avoid certain legal stipulations? By referring to its couriers as 'independent suppliers' could Deliveroo avoid certain employment rights?
- The Committee accused Uber, Deliveroo and Amazon of adding a clause that attempted to prevent people challenging their self-employed status. What is the nature of this clause? Does this prevent challenging self-employed status?
- What can we learn following recent employment cases such as those involving Uber and Pimlico Plumbers?
- Personal service
- No customer/client relationship
- Restrictive covenants
- What are some of the other important issues in employment contracts in the gig economy?
Employment analysis: A parliamentary select committee has been examining the contracts provided to individuals engaged by Uber, Deliveroo and Amazon and has lambasted Uber’s contract as ‘gibberish’. Jackie Feser, a consultant at London employment firm Parker & Co Solicitors, comments on recent developments and controversies regarding interpretation of ‘self-employment’.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial