- Exploring circumstances justifying adjournment (R v SA and others)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Corporate Crime analysis: A decision of the Court of Appeal in R v SA and others throws light on a judge’s power to adjourn under section 59 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA 2003) and on the tests relating to circumstantial evidence and conspiracy to defraud. Christopher Burt, senior associate solicitor at Moon Beever, reports on the case and its implications.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial