- European Court of Human Rights considers UK deportation case (Ndidi v United Kingdom 2017)
- Original news
- What is the significance of this case?
- Why is it important for practitioners? How helpful is this judgment in clarifying the law in this area and are there any remaining grey areas?
- What are the practical implications of the judgment? What should practitioners be mindful of when advising in this area?
- How significant is the dissenting judgment in this case?
- How does this case fit in with other developments in this area of the law?
- Do you have any predictions for future developments in this area?
Immigration analysis: Matthew Moriarty, barrister at Luqmani Thompson & Partners, discusses the significance of Ndidi and the practical implications of the judgment regarding the courts striking a balance between an applicant’s Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) rights to respect for his family and private life and the wider public interest in deportation.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial