- Establishing jurisdiction for claims in tort—when is a parent company liable for its subsidiary? (Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Supreme Court has allowed an appeal concerning the court’s jurisdiction in respect of a claim brought against a UK domiciled parent company in tort for the acts/omissions of a non-UK domiciled subsidiary. The case contains invaluable guidance from the highest court on two key issues: (1) how a judge ought to approach the question of whether there a real issue to be tried in cases where jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales is challenged; and (2) what test is to be applied to answer the question of whether a claimant has a real prospect of success when the claimant seeks to hold a parent company liable for the acts/omissions of its subsidiary. Written by Christopher Snell, barrister at New Square Chambers.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial