Legal News

Escheat, overriding interests and actual occupation (Rock Ferry Waterfront Trust v Pennistone)

Published on: 20 July 2021
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Escheat, overriding interests and actual occupation (Rock Ferry Waterfront Trust v Pennistone)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Property Disputes analysis: The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from the order of His Honour Judge Hodge QC, by which the first instance judge had awarded possession of a plot of land to the claimant/respondent; and had dismissed the appellant’s counterclaim for a declaration that it was entitled to be registered as proprietor of the said land. Among other things, this case discusses when a person will be in actual occupation of land even though they do not themselves occupy the same. In particular, the case considers when it will be sufficient for a party to establish actual occupation via the occupancy of a caretaker or agent. In addition, the case provides helpful guidance as to the fate of land which is owned by a company incorporated otherwise than in accordance with the laws of England and Wales; in circumstances where that company is dissolved while at the same time owning land in England and Wales. Written by Christopher Snell, barrister at New Square Chambers. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents