Legal News

English High Court considers nuances of AA 1996, s 9 appeals (Autoridad del Canal de Panamá v Sacyr & Ors)

Published on: 22 September 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • English High Court considers nuances of AA 1996, s 9 appeals (Autoridad del Canal de Panamá v Sacyr & Ors)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this judgment?
  • What did the court decide?
  • The application for permission to appeal the AA 1996, s 9 decision
  • The application for a stay of proceedings pending appeal against the AA 1996, s 9 decision or pending application to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal
  • The applications on costs
  • Case details

Article summary

Arbitration analysis: In contested proceedings over advance payment guarantees (APGs), Mr Justice Blair in the Commercial Court has delivered a consequential judgment on: an application for permission to appeal the court’s previous decision to dismiss an application for a stay of proceedings pursuant to section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996); an application for a stay of the substantive proceedings pending appeals against the court’s decision on the AA 1996, s 9 stay or pending an application to the Court of Appeal for permission to appeal if necessary; and, costs. The applications concerning the appeal were dismissed, and the costs applications were determined in the claimant’s favour. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents