- Email withdrawal of Part 36 offer validated by wide effect of CPR 3.10 (Thompson v Reeve)
- Original news
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What were the relevant CPR provisions on withdrawal and service?
- Why did the master allow a wide application of CPR 3.10 so as to allow the Part 36 withdrawal notice by email?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: Master Yoxall has allowed a wide interpretation of CPR 3.10 so as to treat as valid notice of withdrawal of a claimant’s Part 36 offer by email in circumstances where the defendants had not previously indicated in writing that they would accept service by email (with reference to CPR PD 6A, para 4.1(1)).
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial