Legal News

Email withdrawal of Part 36 offer validated by wide effect of CPR 3.10 (Thompson v Reeve)

Published on: 23 March 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Email withdrawal of Part 36 offer validated by wide effect of CPR 3.10 (Thompson v Reeve)
  • Original news
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What were the relevant CPR provisions on withdrawal and service?
  • Why did the master allow a wide application of CPR 3.10 so as to allow the Part 36 withdrawal notice by email?
  • Case details

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: Master Yoxall has allowed a wide interpretation of CPR 3.10 so as to treat as valid notice of withdrawal of a claimant’s Part 36 offer by email in circumstances where the defendants had not previously indicated in writing that they would accept service by email (with reference to CPR PD 6A, para 4.1(1)). or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents