Legal News

Disclosed principals—escaping liability? (Bell v Ivy Technology Ltd)

Disclosed principals—escaping liability? (Bell v Ivy Technology Ltd)
Published on: 25 November 2020
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Disclosed principals—escaping liability? (Bell v Ivy Technology Ltd)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Commercial analysis: The Court of Appeal, while accepting that Mr Bell had a very cogent case that the terms of the share purchase agreement (SPA) excluded his liability, it was found that there was a real prospect that, construed in light of the admissible factual matrix, it did not. The court further declined to determine whether Ivy was estopped from claiming against Mr Bell without an investigation of the facts, and decided that the question of whether Ivy had irrevocably elected to bring its claim against Mr Martin as principal was unsuitable for summary determination, noting that it was not clear beyond argument that a third party is required to elect between suing the agent and suing the principal. Written by Emily McWilliams, barrister at Quadrant Chambers. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents