- Defendants in interim payment applications
- Original news
- What is the background to this case?
- What were the central issues in this appeal?
- What does this tell us about expert evidence on causation in the context of an interim payment application?
- What are the practical implications of this decision?
- Does this case leave any unresolved issues?
Personal Injury analysis: What is the burden on a defendant to an application for an interim payment in a clinical negligence claim? Edward Bishop QC of 1 Chancery Lane, who represented the defendant/appellant in Sellar-Elliott v Howling, says the extent of the evidence defendants will need to serve is unclear.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial