- Decisions on facts without assessing hypothetical questions (Re JS (Disposal of Body))
- Original news
- What were the issues before the court?
- How did the court approach the application for a specific issue order under section 8 of the Children Act 1989?
- Of what significance was the proposition that the court should not stray into deciding hypothetical questions?
- What weight was given to the wishes of the child, when balanced with the (different) wishes of the parents?
- While the facts of the case are unusual, was the making of the reporting restriction order in line with previous authorities?
- The judge commented that ‘hard cases make bad law’—does that apply to this case?
- What issues would arise in the case of a deceased adult where the personal representatives and/or beneficiaries of the estate were unwilling to comply with the request?
Family analysis: Jeremy Ford, solicitor-advocate at Cafcass Legal, who acted as advocate (or amicus curiae) in Re JS (Disposal of Body) considers the issues involved in the case.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial