Legal News

CPR 3.14 sanction—client remained liable for costs and so to recovery of same from opponent (Bhatti v Asghar)

CPR 3.14 sanction—client remained liable for costs and so to recovery of same from opponent (Bhatti v Asghar)
Published on: 30 May 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • CPR 3.14 sanction—client remained liable for costs and so to recovery of same from opponent (Bhatti v Asghar)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Dispute Resolution analysis: This article analyses the difficult situation encountered by legal advisors and litigants and potential conflicts where, due to an act or omission by a solicitor in failing to file a costs budget in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), the sanction in CPR 3.14 is applied and the party is treated as having filed a costs budget containing court fees only. Can a paying party under an inter partes costs order stand in the shoes of the litigant to avoid a liability for costs, and is a conflict of interest created in the absence of the solicitor acting under a conditional fee agreement (CFA)? Written by Jon Lord, associate at Weightmans LLP. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents