- Court ruling on costs due to discontinuance (Harrap v Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Personal Injury analysis: A recent clinical negligence claim shows that discontinuance does not always lead to a claimant bearing the costs of the defendant, particularly where the defendant’s conduct was unreasonable as determined by Lambert J. Alicia Tew, barrister at Hailsham Chambers, examines the issues.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial