Legal News

Court rules on equitable relief claims for joint venture agreements (Farrar v Miller)

Published on: 22 February 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Court rules on equitable relief claims for joint venture agreements (Farrar v Miller)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide? Why did the judge think there was merit in the legal arguments of the claimant and appellant?

Article summary

Property analysis: The Court of Appeal has ruled that a case can proceed to trial where a businessman alleges that he was wrongfully excluded from a later deal which saw a property development site sold for £5m, with him receiving nothing. It ruled that the judge below was wrong to strike out claims for breach of a constructive trust, breach of fiduciary duty and for a proprietary estoppel. Barrister Marie-Claire Bleasdale of Radcliffe Chambers, Lincoln’s Inn, comments on what lessons can be learned from this case and considers the wider implications for these types of cases. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents