Legal News

Court of Justice—audiovisual works are not phonograms under the Rental and Lending Rights Directive (Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación v AGEDI)

Court of Justice—audiovisual works are not phonograms under the Rental and Lending Rights Directive (Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación v AGEDI)
Published on: 19 November 2020
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Court of Justice—audiovisual works are not phonograms under the Rental and Lending Rights Directive (Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación v AGEDI)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

TMT analysis: The Court of Justice has ruled on whether the communication to the public of an audiovisual work which incorporates a phonogram, so that the works are synchronised, triggers the right to claim equitable compensation under the Rental and Lending Rights Directive. The definition of a phonogram excludes visual features of the work, meaning the synchronised work being communicated to the public could not be a phonogram. The issue arose in relation to a claim by Spanish collecting societies to equitable compensation from a Spanish TV broadcaster that had communicated an audiovisual work to the public which incorporated a phonogram. The incorporation of the phonogram into the audiovisual work had, itself, been authorised by the relevant rightsholder. Written by Joshua Marshall, senior associate at Fieldfisher LLP. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents