- Court of Appeal sets out a ‘routemap’ in cases involving forced marriage protection and passport orders (Re K, forced marriage: Passport Order)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Family analysis: Jonathan Evans, barrister at 4 Paper Buildings, discusses the decision in Re K (Forced Marriage: Passport Order) in which the Court of Appeal provided guidance on how family courts should approach applications for forced marriage protection orders (FMPO) and passport orders where the protected party objects to the orders and has capacity to do so.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial