- Court of appeal—limits 'extraordinary circumstances' exception to compensation for delayed flights (Jet2.com v Huzar)
- What is Regulation 261/2004?
- The exception to the right to compensation
- What is meant by 'extraordinary circumstances'?
- How should 'extraordinary circumstances' be approached then?
- And the repercussions of this decision?
- Court details
DR analysis: In what is being hailed as ‘an opening of the floodgates’ the Court of Appeal yesterday delivered judgment on the Jet2.com case, concluding that where Mr Huzar’s flight had been delayed due to discovery of a technical fault, this was not an ‘extraordinary circumstance’ which would allow Jet2.com to avoid paying Mr Huzar compensation under Regulation 261/2004. The result is seen as the court applying a common sense approach to the Regulation and subsequent CJEU caselaw on it. It could cost the airline industry considerably.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial