- Court of Appeal considers when tribunals may refuse adjournments on health grounds (General Medical Council v Hayat)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the Court of Appeal decide?
Regulatory analysis: Rory Dunlop, barrister of 39 Essex Chambers, examines the ruling of the Court of Appeal in General Medical Council v Hayat concerning a decision by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal (MPT) to continue with disciplinary proceedings against the respondent doctor in his absence, even though he had produced a sick note.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial