- Court considers whether to set aside or stay a court order (Deutsche Bank v Sebastian Holdings)
- Original news
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was this case about?
- What were the facts?
- The application to set aside the Order
- The effect of setting aside the order
- Would the Court of Appeal re-open its earlier decision?
- The basis on which a stay will be ordered
- Relevance of ECtHR proceedings
- When will a stay be ordered
- What was the position in respect of payment of the cost of detailed assessment?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: Judge Waksman QC has refused to set aside or stay a court order dealing with detailed assessment of costs pending a decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)—the appellant claiming his right to a fair trial had been breached. The judgment reiterates the issues the court will consider when determining whether to set aside or stay a court order and, in particular, considers the approach of the court where there are proceedings in the ECtHR.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial