Legal News

Court considers scope of engineer’s appointment (Williams Tarr v Anthony Roylance)

Published on: 19 September 2018
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Court considers scope of engineer’s appointment (Williams Tarr v Anthony Roylance)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Contracting party
  • Scope of appointment
  • Quantum
  • Case details

Article summary

Construction analysis: The Technology and Construction Court considered the scope of an engineer’s appointment and concluded that he had not been engaged to redesign a retaining wall nor had he warranted that the final design of the wall would be fit for purpose. The court also held that the appointment had been entered into by the engineer in his personal capacity, rather than by his company. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents