- Court considers misrepresentations made by company to investors (Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy v Armstrong-Emery and another)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: Tiran Nersessian, barrister at 4 Stone Buildings, advises that the judgment in Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy v Armstrong-Emery serves as a reminder of the fact that the sensitive nature of the court’s consideration of the statutory test of whether the conduct of a director makes him unfit to be concerned in the management of a company.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial