Legal News

Court considers interim payment ‘correction principle’ and adjudication enforcement (J & B Hopkins v Trant Engineering)

Court considers interim payment ‘correction principle’ and adjudication enforcement (J & B Hopkins v Trant Engineering)
Published on: 28 May 2020
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Court considers interim payment ‘correction principle’ and adjudication enforcement (J & B Hopkins v Trant Engineering)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Construction analysis: The Technology and Construction Court enforced an adjudication decision for the amount stated in a sub-contractor’s interim payment application, rejecting the main contractor’s argument that enforcement should be refused as the sub-contractor’s entitlement to payment had been ‘corrected’ in subsequent interim payment cycles. The court also dismissed the main contractor’s application for a stay of execution on the ground of manifest injustice. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents