Legal News

Court considers acceptance by conduct, estoppel and affirmation (Atlas v Greengate)

Court considers acceptance by conduct, estoppel and affirmation (Atlas v Greengate)
Published on: 12 March 2020
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Court considers acceptance by conduct, estoppel and affirmation (Atlas v Greengate)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Conduct
  • Estoppel
  • Affirmation
  • Case details

Article summary

Commercial analysis: Oliver Browne, a partner at Latham & Watkins (London) LLP, examines a High Court decision that the defendant property owner had validly terminated its agreements with the claimant property management companies. After the defendant had given notice of termination on the grounds of various breaches concerning the claimants' designated person responsible for performing the services under the agreements, the court found that the defendant had not accepted that that person was to be replaced, had not affirmed the agreements and was not estopped from alleging that the claimants had acted in breach of the agreements. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents