- Could climate change refugees become a reality?
- What was the substance of Mr Teitiota’s claim?
- Under what framework was he attempting to be recognised as the first climate change refugee?
- Could Mr Teitiota’s claim start a legal debate around the grounds for claiming refugee status?
- With climate change threatening many areas of the globe, could this be the first of many such claims?
- Would such claims require changes to international treaties on refugees?
- Is there more scope for protection for climate change refugees under the European Convention on Human Rights (EHCR) than the Refugee Convention, given that the problem of showing persecution for a Convention reason is immediately removed?
- Where do we go from here?
Immigration analysis: The case of Teitiota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment highlights the inadequacies of the current refugee and human rights mechanisms to deal with the challenges of a potential future climate change refugee problem. Lee Jackson, barrister at Gherson, details the unsuccessful attempt of Mr Ioane Teitiota to become the world’s first climate change refugee.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial