Legal News

Correct parties to the contract had been named in the adjudication (Donald Insall v Kew Holdings)

Correct parties to the contract had been named in the adjudication (Donald Insall v Kew Holdings)
Published on: 07 March 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Correct parties to the contract had been named in the adjudication (Donald Insall v Kew Holdings)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Construction analysis: The Technology and Construction Court rejected a challenge to enforcement of an adjudication decision, holding that the identity of the contracting parties was clearly the two companies who had participated in the adjudication (rather than the director personally of one of them). In addition, although a second reservation of rights (in respect of a jurisdictional challenge) was sufficient to meet the Bresco v Lonsdale threshold, on the facts the challenge was not made out. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents