- Corporate respondent may be served using trading name and address (Campbell v Jamie Stevens (Kensington) Ltd)
- What are the practical implications of this judgment?
- What is the relevant background?
- Background law
- Background facts
- The decision of the employment tribunal
- What did the EAT decide?
- Case details
Employment analysis: It may be compliant with the ET Rules for a corporate respondent to be served with employment tribunal documents using its trading name and address. The question is whether the documents are sent to an appropriate address, for example, a place of business, and addressed in such a manner that it was apparent the documents were sent to the person who was the respondent to the claim, according to the EAT.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial