Legal News

Corporate respondent may be served using trading name and address (Campbell v Jamie Stevens (Kensington) Ltd)

Corporate respondent may be served using trading name and address (Campbell v  Jamie Stevens (Kensington) Ltd)
Published on: 05 September 2019
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Corporate respondent may be served using trading name and address (Campbell v Jamie Stevens (Kensington) Ltd)
  • What are the practical implications of this judgment?
  • What is the relevant background?
  • Background law
  • Background facts
  • The decision of the employment tribunal
  • What did the EAT decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Employment analysis: It may be compliant with the ET Rules for a corporate respondent to be served with employment tribunal documents using its trading name and address. The question is whether the documents are sent to an appropriate address, for example, a place of business, and addressed in such a manner that it was apparent the documents were sent to the person who was the respondent to the claim, according to the EAT. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents