- Context arguments rejected in Rachel Riley Tweet claim (Riley v Murray)
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
TMT analysis: In this defamation case, the High Court has ruled on the natural and ordinary meaning of a Tweet which concerned the television presenter, Rachel Riley. It held that parts of the Tweet were defamatory at common law and also found as inadmissible contextual evidence which the defendant had sought to rely on.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial