Legal News

Conduct meriting a bankruptcy restrictions order (Official Receiver v Baxendale-Walker)

Published on: 21 February 2020
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Conduct meriting a bankruptcy restrictions order (Official Receiver v Baxendale-Walker)
  • What are the practical implications of this case?
  • What was the background?
  • What did the court decide?
  • Case details

Article summary

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: Four allegations of a bankrupt’s failure to co-operate with the official receiver (OR) were held to be proven and of sufficient seriousness to merit the making of a bankruptcy restrictions order (BRO). The case sheds light on the kind of conduct required for a BRO to be made, and what actions might be considered an effort to frustrate the administration of a bankruptcy estate. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents