Legal News

Commercial weekly highlights—20 January 2022

Published on: 20 January 2022
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Commercial weekly highlights—20 January 2022
  • In this issue:
  • Advertising, marketing & sponsorship
  • Direct marketing rules applicable to inbox advertising (StWL v eprimo)
  • ASA issues further sanctions to non-compliant influencers
  • ASA rulings—19 January 2022
  • HMT announces government plans to strengthen rules on misleading cryptoasset promotions
  • Consumer protection
  • CMA commences review of environmental claims made in fashion retail sector
  • Contracts
  • More...

Article summary

This week’s edition of Commercial weekly highlights includes: analysis of the Court of Justice decision in StWL v eprimo that direct marketing rules are applicable to inbox advertising, analysis of the court’s judgment in Retirement Villages Developments Ltd v Punch Partnership considering the construction and rectification of the termination provisions in a property option, analysis of the judgment in JSC Uraltransmash v PESA in which the Russian Supreme Court rules international sanctions are sufficient to ignore dispute resolution clause, news of the Court of Appeal judgment in Tuke v Hood 2022 which held that a ‘fraudster’ was not liable to obtain credit for the ‘time value’ of the money owed to the victim and analysis of the Court of Appeal decision in Herculito Maritime v Gunvor holding that the bills of lading did not exclude liability on the part of Cargo Interests to pay their share of the GA. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents