- Claim against solicitors statute-barred—Court of Appeal considers flawed transactions and contingent liabilities (Elliott v Hattens Solicitors)
- What are the practical implications of this case?
- What was the background?
- What did the court decide?
- Case details
Dispute Resolution analysis: This appeal concerned whether Mrs Elliott’s claim was barred by the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) and consideration of when damage was first sustained. The judge at first instance held that the claim was not statute-barred. The appeal was allowed, and in so finding the Court of Appeal has set out useful guidance on the differences between ‘no transaction’ cases, ‘flawed transaction’ cases and contingent liabilities in relation to negligence claims against solicitors. Written by Kate Richmond, barrister at 1 Crown Office Row, Brighton.
Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in to LexisPSL or register for a free trial