Legal News

Challenging arbitrators under the UNCITRAL rules (Merck v Ecuador)

Published on: 05 July 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Challenging arbitrators under the UNCITRAL rules (Merck v Ecuador)
  • Original news
  • What was the background to the challenges?
  • What did the tribunal decide?
  • What legal standards were applied?
  • Would the position likely differ under the 2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (2010 UNCITRAL Rules)?
  • Is the position different in International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) arbitration?
  • Are there any trends in this area?

Article summary

Arbitration analysis: On 29 November 2011, Merck Sharp & Dohme (IA) Corporation commenced an arbitration against the Republic of Ecuador under the 1976 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules pursuant to a bilateral investment treaty (BIT) between the US and Ecuador. Merck nominated Judge Schwebel in its notice of arbitration. Clare Connellan, partner at White & Case LLP, reflects on the two decisions regarding the proposed removal of Judge Stephen M Schwebel. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents