Legal News

Challenging a confiscation order (R v Neuberg)

Challenging a confiscation order (R v Neuberg)
Published on: 12 January 2017
Published by: LexisPSL
  • Challenging a confiscation order (R v Neuberg)
  • Original news
  • What was the background to the case?
  • How did the Court of Appeal deal with the appellant’s argument that she had received no benefit?
  • Did the Court of Appeal agree with the appellant that the Crown Court had been in error in determining her benefit by reference to turnover?
  • What issue did the case raise in terms of proportionality and how was this determined?
  • What should practitioners take from this case?
  • In what way, if any, does this decision aid practitioners’ understanding of the concept of benefit from criminal conduct and the requirement of substantial injustice in relation to out-of-time appeals?
  • What criticisms did the court make of the CCRC and do you think they are justified?

Article summary

Corporate Crime analysis: Linda Saunt, barrister at 33 Chancery Lane, argues that the recent case of R v Neuberg provides a helpful reminder of the correct approach to challenging a confiscation order. or take a trial to read the full analysis.

Popular documents